Huliya Esen vs Tamara Curovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W L L
Form
W W W L W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Esen 2 - 0 Curovic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Esen winning 4 and Curovic winning 1. The last match between Esen and Curovic was at the Istanbul, 24-12-2012, Second, I.hard with Huliya Esen getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Huliya Esen | 2 |
| Tamara Curovic | 0 |
Istanbul(24-12-2012)
6
4
7
6
| Esen | Stats | Curovic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 871 | Ranking | 809 |
| 593 | Highest Rank | 394 |
| 35 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 8 |
| 46% (156-181) | Career Total W/L | 55% (374-311) |
| $735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) | |||||
| 6-2 2-6 7-6(8) | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 24 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Huliya Esen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Huliya Esen
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Huliya Esen
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Huliya Esen
Player
Iulia Marko
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Huliya Esen
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelique Svinos
Player
Huliya Esen
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Satsuki Takamura
Player
Huliya Esen
43%
(
32 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Pantuckova
Player
Huliya Esen
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Huliya Esen
Player
Andjela Petrovic
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Curovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Tamara Curovic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pooja Ingale
Player
Tamara Curovic
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve %
48%
(
13 of
27)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
26
Total Points Won
18
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Tamara Curovic
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johanna Silva
Player
Tamara Curovic
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Franziska Kremerskothen
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emmanuelle Girard
Player
Tamara Curovic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
64 of
118)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
16
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
68 of
118)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
53%
(
46 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Arina Solomatina
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Julia Stamatova
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (156/181) | Win/Loss | 55% (374/311) |
| 48% (362/399) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (840/702) |
| 49% (3295/3368) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7230/6579) |
| 49% (50/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (88/86) |
| 46% (99/117) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (232/190) |
| 39% (7/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (53/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 702 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 78 | Total Double Faults | 2316 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:28 |
| 513.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 535.6 |
| 66% (1359/2047) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15224/26157) |
| 53% (717/1359) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (9335/15224) |
| 40% (276/688) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4682/10935) |
| 46% (141/306) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1725/3401) |
| 48% (1018/2106) | Return Points Win % | 48% (12162/25230) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 39% (24/38) | Challenger W/L | 41% (87/125) |
| 48% (129/139) | Futures W/L | 61% (287/185) |
| 46% (152/332) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (370/666) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (27/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (54/115) |
| 41% (35/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (94/186) |
| 84% (165/139) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (378/329) |
| 16% (165/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (378/49) |
| 10% (172/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (306/46) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
